Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Naranjo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1979No. 3969Published

1ConcurrenceWalters, Judge

(specially concurring).

I agree with the result reached, and with respect to the issues delineated in the majority opinion, I wish to state my additional reasons for reversal.

A. The indictment was insufficient upon which to charge perjury.

In its entirety, Count IV read as follows:

[The grand jury of Santa Fe county, State of New Mexico, accuses the defendant of the following crime[s]:

COUNT IV

PERJURY, in that on or about the 4th day of December, 1976, the Defendant, EMILIO NARANJO, did make a false statement under oath or affirmation, material to the issue or matter involved in the course of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API