State v. Naranjo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceWalters, Judge
(specially concurring).
I agree with the result reached, and with respect to the issues delineated in the majority opinion, I wish to state my additional reasons for reversal.
A. The indictment was insufficient upon which to charge perjury.
In its entirety, Count IV read as follows:
[The grand jury of Santa Fe county, State of New Mexico, accuses the defendant of the following crime[s]:
COUNT IV
PERJURY, in that on or about the 4th day of December, 1976, the Defendant, EMILIO NARANJO, did make a false statement under oath or affirmation, material to the issue or matter involved in the course of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.