Legal Opinion
Reed v. Detroit, City of
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-11960Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLETTA REED, Case No. 2:20-cv-11960 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT [28] Plaintiff moved for leave to amend the complaint. ECF 28. Defendant Gibson objected to the motion. ECF 30. The Court has reviewed the briefs and a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f). For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion for leave to amend…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.