Legal Opinion

School District 115 v. Oregon School Employees Ass'n, Chapter 66

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1983No. 81-2-378; CA A23517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This is an action for reformation of a collective bargaining agreement. The trial court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and directed the depositary of funds it had ordered the district to pay into a court-supervised account to deliver those funds to the district. The association appeals, seeking reversal of that portion of the judgment releasing the disputed funds to the district. The district cross-appeals, seeking reversal of that portion of the judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. After executing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. American Federation of State v. Executive DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n v. Gresham Grade School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Pio v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. State Ex Rel. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trout v. Umatilla County School District Uh3-Milton-FreewaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Tracy v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Leanord v. Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API