Legal Opinion

Rauschenbach v. Estate of McDaniel

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1940No. 9061PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

This proceeding involves a negotiable note for $3,025.00, due one year after date, executed by W. W. McDaniel, now deceased, to his son-in-law, Charles W. Rauschen-bach. To the action of the Circuit Court of Taylor County denying to Rauschenbach the right to enforce payment of the note by the estate of the decedent, this writ of error was awarded.

For many years prior to 1935, W. W. McDaniel and his wife resided on a farm owned by him a few miles from the City of Grafton in what is now the basin of the Ty-' garts Valley Dam, which structure was completed in 1937. The McDaniels…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Killeen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Bade v. FeayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Miller v. . McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Good v. DyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Gooch v. GoochWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cabro Foods, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
  2. Lightner v. LightnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lightner v. LightnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Peters v. AltizerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API