Legal Opinion
Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Burgett
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1982No. 13331PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Chief Justice.
Federal Land Bank of Wichita (Bank) foreclosed against Burgett, after which the Bank purchased the property for the amount of the judgment. Burgett then petitioned the trial court for redemption and to set aside the foreclosure sale, citing fundamental error in the sale. The trial court granted Burgett’s petition. A dispute arose between the Bank and Burgett on the question of the amount owed for redemption. The trial court concluded that $248,-671.90 was the amount owed, inclusive of taxes and alike. Burgett appeals, and we reverse in part and affirm in part.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. EllenbergerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Aetna Finance Co. v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BrionezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Construction Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Don Adams Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Kent Nowlin Construction Co. v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Luxton v. LuxtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.