Legal Opinion
EDO Corp. v. Newark Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 9, 1992No. Civ. No. H-90-951 (AHN)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendants’ motion to compel answers to interrogatories and production of documents (dkt. # 134) requests discovery of a variety of information which can be categorized as follows: (1) Documents made in connection with underlying claims for which the plaintiff, EDO, is presently seeking indemnification under its contracts for insurance (“underlying claims file”); (2) information regarding EDO’s disposal, handling and transport of hazardous waste and chemicals; and (3) other interrogatories to which EDO initially interposed objections…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- McDowell Oil Service, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- State v. Hydrite Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Falise v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.