Shepperson v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The question presented is whether Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 175, § 99 assures property damage coverage for an innocent named insured when an unnamed co-insured resident of the premises they share intentionally sets those insured premises afire. Plaintiff Susan Shepperson, the named insured of the insurance policy before me, seeks to establish that she is entitled to coverage irrespective of whether the fire which damaged her residence was caused by her son, who I find to be an unnamed co-insured and also a resident of the premises. Concluding that…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Borges Ex Rel. SMBW v. Serrano-IsernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Adria International Group, Inc. v. Ferré Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schuster v. Encore Boston HarborDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Wenda Aquino v. United Property & Casualty Insurance CompanyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2018