Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Faulkner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 15, 2015No. 14-3332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Joseph Faulkner brings this appeal because he believes that his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment have been violated. In 2011 Faulkner pleaded guilty to two counts of the use of a communication facility in facilitation of a drug-related felony; he was sentenced to a 91-month term of imprisonment on those charges. Two years later, he — along with several other members of the Imperial Insane Vice Lords gang — was indicted on a variety of conspiracy, firearms, and drug charges. Faulkner moved to dismiss the new indictment because, he argued, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Otis SykesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. William MabieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Ladmarald CatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. ALBRECHT v. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
  5. Griffin v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API