Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Target Store, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sidney Leviss, J.
In this personal injury action defendant Target Store, Inc., moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction. Defendant Hart cross-moves for the same relief. This is another in a series of cases attacking the viability of quasi in rem jurisdiction asserted under Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111) and Simpson v Loehmann (21 NY2d 305) by reason of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Shaffer v Heitner (433 US 186).
The action arises out of an injury to the infant plaintiff occurring on March 3, 1970 while she was a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Intermeat, Inc. v. American Poultry Incorporated and a & W FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Savchuk v. RushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Kalman v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rodriguez v. WolfeNew York Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.