Legal Opinion

In Matter of Estate of Barr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 75-522PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The single issue presented in this case is whether the trial court correctly determined that under the provisions of the trust document, the distributive share transferred to the widow was a life estate.

On July 7, 1972, Harry G. Barr (hereinafter grantor or settlor) established a revocable trust. Constance B. Barr, his wife (hereinafter widow), was to become a beneficiary under the terms of the trust. She and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Racine (hereinafter jointly referred to as respondents) were named as co-trustees. In pertinent part, the trust instrument provided:

“SECOND.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Breese v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lichter v. ThiersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Welch v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Mahon v. Security First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Estate of Gehl v. ReingruberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Administration by LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Protection & Advocacy Project of State v. JawaskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API