Cleevelandt Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The above-entitled protests were consolidated for trial, and relate to merchandise which is described on the invoices as “billes saphir” and as “balls for stylographe.” Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 72' cents per dozen and 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1550 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for parts of fountain pens or stylographic pens» Although various claims were made in the protests, all were actually, or, in effect^ abandoned save the claim for duty at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem by similitude to the articles composed wholly or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Air Clearance Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Herman D. Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957