Legal Opinion
Andrew A. Accardo v. Natalie R. Capano, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-16857Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANDREW A. ACCARDO, Civil Action No. 25-16857 (JXN)(JSA) Plaintiff, v. OPINION NATALIE R. CAPANO, et al., Defendants. NEALS, District Judge Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Andrew A. Accardo’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint (ECF No. 1), amended complaint (ECF No. 10), and application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 1-2). The Court has reviewed the IFP Application and screened Plaintiff's Complaint and Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the IFP Application and DISMISSES…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.