State v. Carstens
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Per curiam
The defendant, Curtis Carstens, appeals the imposition of a $5000 fine following his guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, as an habitual offender, in violation of Iowa Code sections 124.401(l)(c), 902.8 and 902.9 (1997). Car-stens argues section 902.9 authorizes the imposition of fines for only certain classes of felons. He contends no fine is authorized where a defendant is sentenced as an habitual offender. See Iowa Code § 902.9(2). We affirm.
Our review of challenges to the legality of a sentence is for errors at law. State v. Sisk, 577 N.W.2d 414, 416 (Iowa…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. SiskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tindell v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. HaltermanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2001
- State Of Iowa Vs. Dawn Marie Nail And Joshua KuceraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.