Legal Opinion

State v. Carstens

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 28, 1999No. 98-246PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Curtis Carstens, appeals the imposition of a $5000 fine following his guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, as an habitual offender, in violation of Iowa Code sections 124.401(l)(c), 902.8 and 902.9 (1997). Car-stens argues section 902.9 authorizes the imposition of fines for only certain classes of felons. He contends no fine is authorized where a defendant is sentenced as an habitual offender. See Iowa Code § 902.9(2). We affirm.

Our review of challenges to the legality of a sentence is for errors at law. State v. Sisk, 577 N.W.2d 414, 416 (Iowa…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. State v. SiskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. State v. DanielSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tindell v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. State v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. State v. HaltermanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2001
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. Dawn Marie Nail And Joshua KuceraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API