Legal Opinion

Tindell v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 5, 2001No. 00-0118PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

In 1995 James Tindell entered a plea of guilty to fraudulent conduct under Iowa Code sections 502A.6 and 502A.14(1) (1995). He withdrew the plea at sentencing, however, because the sentencing judge refused to grant probation. On the same day, Tindell was sentenced by a different judge, without again pleading guilty. In this postconviction-relief proceeding, Tin-dell argues his sentence was “illegal” because “at the time of sentencing there was no plea or finding of guilt on the record. The previous plea of guilty had been withdrawn by leave of court, and it had not been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CeaserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. State v. OhnmachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. State v. WoodySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. State v. LathropSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. Lopez-Penaloza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
  5. State v. ShearonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API