Legal Opinion

Reel v. Brammer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1913No. 7,853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom Randolph Circuit Court; J. 8. Engle, Judge. Action by Wiley G. Reel, as receiver of The Dandy Oil Company, against Robert P. Brammer and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, C. J.

By this action appellant sought to recover from appellees severally a part of the difference between the price paid for stock held by each appellee in The Dandy Oil Company and the par value of such stock, sufficient to pay the liabilities of the corporation, after exhausting its tangible assets. The court on request made a special find*182ing of facts, and. stated conclusions of law thereon. Judgment was rendered on the conclusions of law, that appellant take nothing by his action, and that appellees recover their costs.

Numerous questions are presented and argued by appellant, but the important…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Big Creek Stone Co. v. SewardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Price v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Runner v. DwigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Turner v. Henshaw, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Welliver, Rec. v. CoateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API