Legal Opinion
Ness v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 1956No. Civ. 5418PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURCH, J. pro tem. *
The plaintiff sued the city of San Diego to recover damages for injuries occasioned by a fall, “when she was caused to lose her balance and fall to the sidewalk in front of the residence at 927 Beryl Street,” in San Diego. The case was tried before a jury; a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff for damages assessed in the sum of $3,258.01. Judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court granted the motion, vacated the judgment for plaintiff, and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gentekos v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Ellis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Beck v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.