Legal Opinion

Harris v. Diamond Dolls of Nevada, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00598Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 CLARISSA HARRIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 6 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-CV-00598-RCJ-CLB 7 vs. ORDER 8 DIAMOND DOLLS OF NEVADA, LLC, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 Plaintiff moves for preliminary certification of the proposed class and approval of the 13 proposed Notice and Consent forms. (ECF No. 35 (motion); ECF No. 36 Ex. B (notice); ECF No. 14 36 Ex. C (consent).) Defendants do not oppose preliminary certification or notice to potential class 15 members but argue that Plaintiff’s proposed notice should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Graziano v. Michigan Associated Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API