Legal Opinion

Maher v. City of Box Elder

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2019No. #28600-r-PERPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶1.] William Maher brought suit against the City of Box Elder (the City), arguing it negligently operated its water system and caused his waterlines to break. The City moved for summary judgment, asserting the public duty rule precluded imposition of a duty to Maher absent proof the City assumed a special duty. The circuit court granted summary judgment. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] William Maher owns a mobile home park in Box Elder and receives water from the City's water system. The City owns, operates, and maintains its water system in part to supply water to its resident…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Walther v. KPKA Meadowlands Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Verity Ex Rel. Verity v. DantiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fodness v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API