Legal Opinion

Condon v. Des Moines Mutual Hail Ass'n

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from 'Webster District Court. — Hon. S. M. Weaves, J uclge. Action at law on a hail insurance policy. Trial tó a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The jury fixed the plaintiff’s damages at $76, and it is strenuously urged that the evidence fails to show any damage. The plaintiff testified as to the acreage i Evidence: verdict. corn affected by the hailstorm in question, and as £0 amounf 0f corn harvested from the same. As to the first point, it may surely be said that the evidence was conflicting. The plaintiff was a farmer himself, and had owned the land in question for many years; and, if the jury believed that he was a truthful witness, it was justified in finding that he knew very closely the number of acres of corn he had in that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Green v. Des Moines Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Dyer v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. George Dee & Sons Co. v. Key City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Barry v. Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Lee v. Farmers Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. LeMars Mutual Insurance Company v. TaslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Sly v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State Insurance Co. v. LockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API