Legal Opinion

Estill v. Fort

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 7, 1834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Madison County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Fort sued Estill and wife, in Trover, for a slave named Dick ; and the circuit court having granted a new trial, on the ground that, in the opinion of that court, the evidence was insufficient to sustain the first verdict against the wife, another verdict was rendered, at a subsequent term, against both husband and wife, for five hundred seventy one dollars forty eight cents, in damages ; for which, the court, after overruling a motion for another new trial, gave judgment: to reverse which, this writ of error is prosecuted.

The counsel for the plaintiffs urges four principal grounds for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meegan v. GunsollisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  2. Baker v. BraslinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1889
  3. In re BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1842
  4. Tobey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API