Legal Opinion

Huddleston v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1934No. 5 Div. 177PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this suit was filed in equity to enforce a vendor’s lien. Complainant was the vendor, and took notes for deferred purchase-money payments. The notes were assigned to Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank of I/ineville as collateral security for a debt.Such transfer passed the lien and the right to enforce it. Section 9236, Code.

The evidence shows that the debt to the bank was due and still unpaid, and that the bank president returned to complainant the notes with authority to collect them for the bank. The proceeds of the collection are to be under the arrangement paid to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Stringfellow v. IvieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Broughton v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Goodman v. BenhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roubicek v. RoubicekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Amann v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Walker County v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API