Legal Opinion

United States v. Olanda L. Carelock

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 2006No. 05-3515PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Olanda Carelock appeals the sentence that he received following the revocation of his supervised release. He argues that the sentence — 14 months’ imprisonment and 36 months’ supervised release (which was reduced to 22 months on account of the 14-month period of incarceration) — is unreasonable. 1 Because Carelock failed to file a timely notice of appeal that complied with the requirements of Rule 3(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or was the functional equivalent of what the rule requires, we will dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 2

I

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rudolph Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Philip Martin SadlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. DL Resources, Inc. v. FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Eluterio Mauro Leijano-Cruz, Also Known as Joel Lujano-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API