Legal Opinion

Lowry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1946No. 9920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated cases present the not infrequent situation arising in tax cases out of a change from doing business under the corporate form to doing business under a partnership between husband and wife. Deficiencies determined by the Commissioner for the taxable years 1939 and 1940 against each taxpayer were upheld by the Tax Court.

The taxpayers, O. William Lowry and Charles R. Sligh, Jr., conducted business as a corporation, manufacturing furniture at Holland, Michigan, until 1938. After January, 1937, all of the stock was owned by the taxpayers in equal shares,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Commissioner v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Tower v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WhitselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Apt v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. Thorrez v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  4. Dawson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. Appel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API