Sheppard v. Sheppard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. Strict technical pleadings are not required in a habeas corpus proceeding between rival contestants for the custody of minor children. Where a writ has been issued and in response thereto the children have been brought into court, the better practice is to inquire into the evidence necessary to a proper decision of the case, unless the petition alleges facts which show affirmatively as a matter of law that the respondent is entitled to the custody of the children. McDowell v. Gould, 166 Ga. 670 (144 S. E. 206); Wilkinson v. Lee, 138 Ga. 360 (75 S. E. 477); McCoy v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McDowell v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Wilkinson v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Kilgore v. TillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Alford v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Dutton v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Moody v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Jones v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.