Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Sheppard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1951No. 17588PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. Strict technical pleadings are not required in a habeas corpus proceeding between rival contestants for the custody of minor children. Where a writ has been issued and in response thereto the children have been brought into court, the better practice is to inquire into the evidence necessary to a proper decision of the case, unless the petition alleges facts which show affirmatively as a matter of law that the respondent is entitled to the custody of the children. McDowell v. Gould, 166 Ga. 670 (144 S. E. 206); Wilkinson v. Lee, 138 Ga. 360 (75 S. E. 477); McCoy v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. McDowell v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Wilkinson v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Kilgore v. TillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Alford v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Dutton v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Moody v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Jones v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API