Legal Opinion

Hall v. Gradwohl

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 20, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Opinion upon motion for re-argument, June 23rd, 1910. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Stock-bridge, J.).

1Opinion of the Court

On December 10th, 1909, the appellant entered into a contract with the appellees to purchase certain property in the City of Baltimore. This property is particularly described in the contract of purchase, wherein it is declared that all its terms and provisions shall be null and void, unless the vendors had a good and merchantable title to the property. The appellant refused to complete the purchase upon the ground that the appellees could not convey a good title. They thereupon instituted a suit for the specific performance of the contract, and from the decree of the lower Court which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Reilly v. BristowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Clarke v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Travers v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Williams v. J. C. Armiger & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Vogt v. GraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Perin v. PerinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Blair v. KenastonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API