William P. Hooten v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is another case arising out of land condemnations by the United States in furtherance of the Chamizal Settlement with Mexico. 1 William P. Hooten, the appellant, alleged in his complaint that he was the owner of the Lee Newman Agency, which counted among its assets certain contracts with the owners of four tenement properties in the Chamizal tract. Under these management contracts the agency was to collect the rents and retain a portion thereof as commissions. The United States condemned the four tenement properties and, as an incidental consequence of such taking, the agency’s contracts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Japanese War Notes Ass'n of the Philippines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westside Quik Shop, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- United States v. 0.073 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Parishes of Orleans & JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- T.O.F.C., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- AVM-HOU, Ltd. v. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- AVM-HOU, Ltd. v. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.