Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sard v. Hardy

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 1976No. 853, September Term, 1975Published

1DissentDavidson, J.

In its opinion, the majority fails to consider material facts, fails to consider the central issue decided by the trial *240court, unnecessarily decides issues, and decides those issues erroneously. I respectfully dissent.

I

Viewed in the light most favorable to the appellants,1 the record shows that in 1965, during the eighth month of her first pregnancy, Mrs. Said developed eclampsia and suffered 21 convulsions. It was possible, as a result, that she and her baby might die. An emergency Caesarian section was performed in an effort to save them both. The baby did not survive. In March, 1967, Mrs.…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lilly v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API