Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Zell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 4, 1977No. [No. 56, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

In this condemnation action brought by Baltimore City, the City had employed an appraiser to evaluate the subject property but did not call that particular appraiser as a witness. The defendant property owners then called the same appraiser as a defense witness. The City did not attempt to show that the appraiser was biased and did not in any manner attack his credibility. Nevertheless, over the objection of the City, the trial court permitted defense counsel to bring out the fact that the City had initially employed the witness in connection with the case. The principal issue on this appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larry Howard Homan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Phillip Coltrane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. McMullen v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. United States v. Mack AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. State v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Fitzgerald v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Durkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API