Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1993No. [P.C. No. 93, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

222 Md. 618 (1960)

159 A.2d 851

CARROLL

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[P.C. No. 93, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 18, 1960.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND and HORNEY, JJ.

2Per curiam

The petitioner's contentions deal mainly with the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict, which is not a ground for post conviction relief. Banks v. Warden, 221 Md. 592, 155 A.2d 697. Although he complains that he was not given a transcript of the testimony of his original trial, there is no allegation that he either requested such a transcript or that he sought an…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Banks v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Carroll v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellinger v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Scott v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Smith v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API