Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 18, 1960No. P. C. No. 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner’s contentions deal mainly with the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict, which is not a ground for post conviction relief. Banks v. Warden, 221 Md. 592, 155 A. 2d 697. Although he complains that he was not given a transcript of the testimony of his original trial, there is no allegation that he either requested such a transcript or that he sought an appeal and was prevented from perfecting it as a result of being denied the transcript, or otherwise. His application to the lower court shows no grounds for relief under *619the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Banks v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellinger v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Carroll v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Scott v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Carroll v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Smith v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API