Legal Opinion

Matter of Schwartz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1978No. 12089PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an attorney, was summarily adjudged guilty of contempt of court and ordered to pay a fine of $200 or serve a sentence of ten days in jail. He contends on appeal the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of contempt. We agree and reverse.

Appellant was counsel for a defendant (husband) in a divorce proceeding in the Domestic Relations Branch of Superior Court. The divorce had been granted by the court in February 1976, but the case was continued for further hearings to determine the questions of custody of the minor child, the amount of child support, and whether attorney’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Jacques M. SchifferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. In the Matter of David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McBride v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Warrick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Matter of GorfkleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Hopkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API