Legal Opinion

Shane Crawford v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2016No. 43141PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature op the' Case

Shane Crawford (“Crawford”), the appellant, filed a petition for post-conviction relief following his conviction for lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, claiming that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at both the trial and appellate stages. At the trial stage, Crawford asserts that his counsel was deficient in failing to request that the court either instruct the jury that manual-genital contact requires touching the vaginal area or define the term “genital.” He further asserts that his trial counsel erred by failing to move…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John David Wurdemann v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Thompson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. PaulsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. John David Wurdemann v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. NevarezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API