Legal Opinion

Jones v. Dental Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 6, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

In 1926, § 2906 of the Chapter of the General Statutes dealing with the practice of dentistry provided that all unlicensed assistants who registered their names with the dental commissioners prior to October 1st, 1907, might continue to practice as assistants, provided they performed dental operations on patients in the office and in the immediate presence of a registered or licensed dentist and directly under his supervision, but that the commissioners might cancel the registration of any person so practicing for any of the reasons set forth in § 2901. One of these reasons was a violation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hufnagle v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. State v. FaatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. People v. LiphardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dalton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pagán Hernández v. Universidad de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  2. Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Patty v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API