Smith v. Ledbetter Brothers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
A fair interpretation of the facts alleged is that at the time of the collision the defendants were in the process of constructing the interstate highway and that until the dirt barricade was placed across the road, Peters Street was a heavily traveled thoroughfare. It is also a fair construction of the petition that the dirt barricade thrown up in the course of such construction was in the area over which the defendants had assumed control in the progress of their work, and that as to such area they were by contract charged with the duty of providing all safeguards reasonably…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doby v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Trammell v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Holland v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Murdock v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- LEDBETTER-JOHNSON COMPANY v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miree v. United StatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Backus v. ChilivisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Basurto v. Utah Construction & Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Miree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- M. R. Thomason & Associates, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.