Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1962No. 39282, 39283PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.; The petitions charge the defendant contractor was negligent in three particulars: (1), (2) in not providing signs warning of impending danger nor providing a stop sign at the dead-end intersection; and (3) in constructing a dangerous intersection.

By Code Ann. § 95-604 there is vested in the State Highway Board and its representatives “exclusive authority and jurisdiction for the erection and maintenance of signs along the highways of this State composing the State-aid system of roads . . .” and this exclusive authority in the State Highway Board and its representatives includes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. SchmedesTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Schwarcz v. Charlton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Howard v. KnutsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Archer v. Rogers Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Purvis v. Virgil Barber Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Reed v. Ed Taylor Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Smith v. Ledbetter Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Lawson v. ENTECH ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API