Legal Opinion
In the Interest of Cooper
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided December 12, 1980No. 51,276PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
The district attorney’s office filed a petition January 3, 1979, alleging that Julie Cooper was a deprived child within the meaning of K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 38-802. Julie was the one-year-old daughter of Marilyn Dickey (appellant). Temporary custody was granted to the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) pending hearing of the petition. Appellant was served with summons January 8, 1979, advising her that an attorney had been appointed to represent Julie and that appellant could retain an attorney if she wished. A second summons was received March 29, 1979, containing…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Nathanael Smith v. Newsome et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026