Legal Opinion
Nathanael Smith v. Newsome et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 15, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00592Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHANAEL SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00592-KES-BAM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED 13 v. AND PLAINTIFF BE DENIED LEAVE TO AMEND 14 NEWSOME et al., (Doc. 14) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On April 14, 2025, Plaintiff Nathanael Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis, filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants Judge Kevin Seibert, 20 Judge Hallie Campbell, Judge David Beyersdorf, Commissioner Philip Pimentel, Ryan Campbell, 21…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.