Legal Opinion

Manning v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1963No. [No. 134, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

After the chancellor decreed that a plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of an option to purchase real estate, the defendant appealed.

Two questions are presented: (1) Was the option contract fair and reasonable, in the sense that these terms are used in the law relating to specific performance, so as to justify the relief granted?; and (2) Did the availability of the right of eminent domain oust the jurisdiction of the equity court to grant specific performance?

In 1958, the defendant below, Mrs. Manning, acquired a tract of 6.74 acres of land near Naurel, in Prince George’s County,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Towson Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Pollin v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Hanley v. StulmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Straus v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ver Brycke v. Ver BryckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Matter of Estate of FrederickWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crafts v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crafts v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API