Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. R. R. v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1974No. State 245PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are raised on this original action.

1. In an administrative hearing concerning revocation of a juvenile’s aftercare supervision, does the juvenile have a constitutional right to inspect and reply to the hearing examiner’s report?

2. Do the fair-play provisions of the Wisconsin Administrative Procedure Act apply to such revocation hearings?

3. What effect, if any, has sec. 48.78, Stats., upon the juvenile’s right to inspect the hearing examiner’s report?

Constitutional right.

Both parties agree that petitioner has a constitutional right to inspect the hearing examiner’s report under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In RE DMD (A MINOR) v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Bernal v. HershmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Coleman v. PercyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lehndorff Geneva, Inc. v. WarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API