Legal Opinion

Ludd v. Van Hoose

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1930No. 3835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

This appeal is by plaintiff from a judgment rejecting his demands for compensation for disability alleged to have resulted from an injury received while at work for the defendant, Van Hoose, at a cotton gin. Plaintiff originally asked for compensation for three hundred weeks, but before this court his counsel ask for only eighteen weeks, plus $143 for hospital and surgical expenses.

The facts briefly stated are that the plaintiff, while at work for defendant Van Hoose on September 7, 1929, while engaged with another colored man in loading a bale of cotton onto a truck, strained himself to such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Jordan v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Giamalva v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1953
  4. Waggener v. Forcum-James Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API