Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Eagle-Picher Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1962No. 39586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The present proceeding was instituted below under the provisions of the Occupational Disease Amendment to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. 85 O.S.Supp.1959 § 3, subdiv. (7) and (16) (m). Claimant sought statutory benefits for permanent total disability due to affliction with silicosis. The State Industrial Court denied the claim based on its finding that “ * * * claimant does not have silicosis, nor is he permanently and totally disabled * * * It is to be noted that silicosis is not compensable under the Act, unless it results in permanent total disability. 85 O.S.Supp.1959 §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Association v. MaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. National Zinc Company v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Greer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Happel v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rush Implement Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Southwest Stone Company v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Kier v. BurtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API