Legal Opinion

Rush Implement Co. v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1963No. 40083PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

On October 19, 1961, Howard Hurman Vaughn, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that he sustained an accidental injury while employed by Rush Implement Company, hereinafter called petitioner.

Following a hearing conducted to determine the cause and extent of disability and need for medical treatment, the trial judge entered an order on January 8, 1962, awarding claimant further medical treatment and compensation for temporary total disability not to exceed 300 weeks; holding that claimant sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Kingfisher v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Choctaw County v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. National Biscuit Co. v. LoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Oklahoma Leader Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bama Pie, Ltd. v. RaesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. Akers Auto Salvage v. WaddleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API