Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CORCORAN, Justice.
This is the third appellate decision in a lawsuit originating more than 6 years ago involving a disputed real estate commission in the amount of $6,382.50. At this point in the litigation, the parties each have accumulated attorneys’ fees totalling at least 6 times the amount of the original claim. Thus, the attorneys’ fees apparently are currently the driving force of the litigation. Although we are reluctant to prolong this epic battle, we granted review because we believe the court of appeals erred in applying the facts and the law in this case. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Leikvold v. Valley View Community HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Mary Wilcox v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Dimitri Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.