Legal Opinion

Rhoads v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1883No. 10,466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellees, upon an oral agreement for the care and support of one Indiana Castor.

The facts stated in the appellant’s complaint are, substantially, as follows:

Isaac Castor, the father of Indiana Castor, died testate, and his will was admitted to probate. Among its provisions was one devising to the appellant certain personal property and real estate, of the value of $6,000, with the condition subsequent that the appellant should> support and care for said Indiana as long as she remained unmarried. In February, 1876, the appellees and others, instituted suit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Oiler v. GardIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Durland v. PitcairnIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hall v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Coleman v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tucker v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Forbing v. WeberIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Swanson-Nunn Realty Co., Inc. v. GentryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Kansas City Breweries Co. v. HaffeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API