Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. M & M Imports, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 15, 2021No. 7:21-cv-00055Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE STARLEN RUSSELL HATFIELD and ) CHARLENE HATFIELD, ) ) No. 7:21-CV-055-REW-EBA Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) OPINION and ORDER ) M&M IMPORTS, INC., d/b/a/ ) WALTERS TOYOTA NISSAN, and ) CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP., ) ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiffs Starlen Russell Hatfield and Charlene Hatfield sued Credit Acceptance Corporation (“CAC”) and M&M Imports, Inc. (d/b/a Walters Toyota Nissan, “Walters”) based on claims arising from a car sale that occurred on or around July 3, 2020. See DE 1. Upon service, CAC moved…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API