Sabrina Polkey v. Transtecs Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Transtecs Corporation appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to Sabrina Polkey on her claim that Tran-stecs requested her to take a polygraph exam, in violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (“EPPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2002(1) (2005). Transtecs argues that summary judgment was inappropriate because the district court erred as a matter of law in concluding that a request to take a polygraph exam alone constitutes an EPPA violation. Transtecs further contends that its polygraph request falls within two of the EPPA’s exemptions: (i) the national defense and security…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Hossaini v. Western Missouri Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cummings v. Washington MutualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Gary Lee Watson v. Drummond Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Laney v. GettyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Campbell v. Woodard Photographic, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Wolfe v. Tobacco Express II, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.