Legal Opinion
Kelvin Lamonte Lampkins v. Robert Thompson Archie Luss, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2003No. 02-2362PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Circuit Judge.
Kelvin Lamonte Lampkins (Lampkins) claims his constitutional right against unreasonable search and seizure was violated when federal agents Robert Thompson and Archie Luss, Jr. (collectively the Agents) stopped him at an airport on July 8, 1993. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 395-97, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Lampkins sued the Agents. A jury returned a verdict for the Agents. The district court 1 entered judgment in the Agents’ favor and assessed costs against Lampkins. Lamp- kins appeals the judgment on six grounds: (1) the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cottrell v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Emily Rivera v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Patricia Littrell, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Daniel Jake Franklin, in His Official and Individual Capacities, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Wilson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Stachon v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Wingert & Associates, Inc. v. Paramount Apparel International, Inc., Wingert & Associates, Inc. v. Paramount Apparel International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.