Legal Opinion

Gambill v. Cassimus

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1945No. 6 Div. 146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Motion by appellants’ testator for scire facias to revive a dormant judgment under Chapter 11, Article 8, Title 7, § 574 et seq., Code 1940.

The appellants’ testator was the assignee of the judgment, the assignment having been in writing.

The appellees advance the theory that the assignee can revive only as specified in § 579, and that because the assignment of the present judgment was by separate instrument and not “indorsed on the execution docket or on the margin of the record of the judgment * * * and * * * attested by the clerk” etc., as directed in said § 579, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Hoffman v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. RSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Henderson v. Planters & M. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Richards v. WalpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slay v. McKean Paint and Hardware Store, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Powles v. KandrasiewiczDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1995
  3. Davis International, Inc. ex rel. Patel v. BerrymanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Willey v. WilleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  5. Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Michael Todd ShelleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API