Legal Opinion
Palomo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided December 22, 2010No. 07-10-0181-CV, 07-10-0182-CV, 07-10-0183-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice.
On May 5, 2010, Appellant, Benny Joe Palomo, filed notices of appeal challenging the withdrawal notifications entered by the trial court in each referenced cause. By opinion dated May 19, 2010, this Court concluded that no final, appealable orders had been entered and found Appellant’s notices of appeal to be premature. Relying on Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315 (Tex.2009), the appeals were abated for 180 days to allow Appellant an opportunity to challenge the withdrawals from his inmate account 1 in the trial court and obtain appealable orders.
Generally, an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Chavez, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Ogletree v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Harrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- O'CONNOR v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Billy Ray Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Billy Ray Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Edward L. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
- Jack E. Whitney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Jack E. Whitney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.