Legal Opinion

Reliance Insur. Co. v. Watts

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 9, 1972No. 46, September Term, 1972PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This Workmen’s Compensation appeal leaves the claimant, having been awarded maximum benefits for permanent total disability, in the enviable legal position of a disinterested spectator, while his employer’s insurer and the Subsequent Injury Fund litigate the question of what proportion of the total award each should pay.

Ralph C. Watts, Sr. was injured in the course of his employment as a guard, or night watchman, on March 4, 1970. Some years earlier he had sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident, one result of which was the amputation of his left leg. He performed his watchman duties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. PackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. RinehartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Dent v. CahillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. State v. RodriguezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Subsequent Injury Fund v. KrausCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ComptonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API